May 30, 2006 Volume 15 No. 11 Update on Pest Management and Crop Development
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Upcoming Pest Events | Trap Catches | Pest Focus | Insects | Diseases | Erratum
Upcoming Pest
Events | Trap Catches | Pest
Focus | Insects | Diseases | Erratum
Upcoming Pest Events | Trap Catches | Pest Focus | Insects | Diseases | Erratum Geneva: Lesser Peachtree Borer trap catch increasing. Highland: High
levels of Plum Curculio ovipositional damage occurring this
Upcoming Pest Events | Trap Catches | Pest Focus | Insects | Diseases | Erratum
Geneva Predictions: Codling Moth Obliquebanded Leafroller Oriental Fruit Moth Spotted Tentiform Leafminer
Summer arrived beating the bass drum over the weekend, and although arthropods respond positively to hotter conditions, pest management decisions tend to be more straightforward than they are during cool and wet weather, as things tend to happen on a more predictable schedule. If there's such a thing as a normal schedule, insects and mites are probably a bit ahead of it already, so this may increase the likelihood a lot of management decisions might have to be made all at once. The following are updates on some of the traditional crop protection scenarios during this period. Dates in parentheses, where present, are the mean date of occurrence in Geneva, according to our recent records. Plum
Curculio (May 24 - scars present) European
Apple Sawfly Obliquebanded
Leafroller (June 10) Stone Fruit Aphids Cherry
Fruit Flies (June 16) Lesser Peachtree Borer (May 25) European
Red Mite In situations where European red mite pressure or the crop's sensitivity to them haven't necessarily justified an early season treatment with any of the above options, this is the time of year when a summer oil program also might be considered as an alternate preventive approach, particularly considering this species' slow start during the spring. Our field research trials have shown the effectiveness of using a highly refined oil in a seasonal program to control mites throughout the summer. Some examples of these products are PureSpray Spray Oil 10E or BioCover UL or PureSpray Green (all from Petro Canada), Stylet-Oil (JMS Flower Farms), and Omni Supreme (an ExxonMobil product formulated using Orchex 796 and distributed in our area by Helena); others are labeled, such as Damoil (Drexel) and Mite-E-Oil (Helena) although we haven't tested all brands. Note that Sunspray Ultra Fine Spray Oil (Sun Refining & Marketing, Philadelphia) is no longer registered in NYS. Our approach is to make three applications, on a preventive schedule, immediately after the petal fall period, before mite populations have a chance to build. The first application can be any time from petal fall to 1-2 weeks later, followed by two additional sprays at 10-14-day intervals. The oil is not concentrated in the tank, but rather mixed on the basis of a rate per 100 gallons of finish spray solution; in most cases, we recommend 100 gal per acre. A rate of 1-2 gal/100 should maintain control of most moderate populations. Don't apply without leaving at least a 10-14-day interval before or after a captan spray. San
Jose Scale (June 19 - 1st crawlers) In the Geneva area, first crawler emergence has tended to occur sometime around mid-June. The NEWA Apple Pest DD Calculator predictions are for this to occur in 7-10 days around western NY, which means slightly sooner in the Hudson Valley. Lorsban used to be the standard recommended treatment for scale, and since it's no longer labeled for summer use, we're fortunate to have Esteem 35WP available, which is quite effective against this pest. It should be applied at 4-5 oz/acre at first crawler emergence; a low rate (0.25% or 1 qt/100) of a highly refined summer oil (see above) has been shown to improve penetration and, therefore, control. The remaining OPs such as Guthion and Imidan, as well as Provado, are alternative options. Oriental
Fruit Moth Pear
Psylla
Upcoming Pest Events | Trap Catches | Pest Focus | Insects | Diseases | Erratum
Leaf spots on fruit trees are caused by a wide variety of pathogens and abiotic factors. Most growers can identify typical leaf lesions caused by apple scab, cedar apple rust, powdery mildew, and cherry leaf spot. However, when leaves develop small, nondescript brown leaf spots or small shot holes, even experienced plant pathologists often have difficulty identifying the causes. Fortunately, the nondescript leaf spot diseases in the Northeastern United States rarely cause economic losses, even when their appearance temporarily disfigures the tree canopy. The fungi causing apple leaf spot diseases either do not have secondary cycles on leaves or they are easily controlled with fungicides and appear only when fungicide protection is disrupted by extended spring rain events. Abiotic leaf spots that develop shortly after petal fall are often attributable to agrichemical mixtures that have caused localized phytotoxicity. Following are some of the most common causes of early season leaf spots and clues for determining their causes. This article focuses on leaf spots that may appear in May, June, and July. Leaf spots with other causes and symptoms sometimes appear during August and September, but they will not be discussed here. Frog-eye leaf spot, caused by Botryosphaeria obtusa, is the stereotypical leaf spot disease on apples. Frog-eye leaf spots are round, dark brown spots, 2-5 mm in diameter, with an almost black border and a tan center (Fig. 1).
Individual leaves may have a single spot or as many as 30 to 50 spots. Frog-eye can usually be differentiated from other kinds of leaf spots by its non-random distribution and its association with nearby inoculum sources. In sprayed orchards, frog-eye leaf spots are usually concentrated in the vicinity of mummified fruitlets that were retained after fruit thinning. Fruitlet mummies can be colonized by B. obtusa and then provide inoculum for infecting the leaves the following season. Spores are dispersed by splashing rain between tight cluster and about second cover. Frog-eye is most common on apple cultivars such as Cortland, Northern Spy, and Honeycrisp, that retain many fruitlets after chemical thinning (Fig. 2)
However, all cultivars may retain thinned fruit in years when weather conditions fail to promote rapid abscission of thinned fruitlets. Frog-eye leaf spot may cause premature drop of severely affected leaves, but most damage from frog-eye is cosmetic. The same fungus that causes frog-eye leaf spot also causes black rot fruit decay, but there is no evidence that leaf spots contribute to fruit infection. Instead, the inoculum for fruit infection comes from the same fruit mummies that provide the inoculum for leaf infection. Thus, frog-eye on leaves can be viewed as an indicator for conditions that may have favored infection of fruit, but the leaves themselves do not contribute directly to the development of black rot on fruit. Black rot infections in fruit may remain quiescent until fruit ripen because green fruit contain inhibitors that prevent fungal growth. Most fungicides control frog-eye leaf spot, but the SI fungicides (Rubigan, Nova, Procure) and the 3 lb/A rates of mancozeb or Polyram are less effective than captan, Flint, and Sovran. Severity of leaf spotting around fruitlet mummies may be affected by the fungicide program that was used the previous season because fungicides used after thinning may prevent the fruitlets from becoming infected as they dry out during summer. However, the relationship between spray programs, colonization of retained fruitlets by B. obtusa, and inoculum levels within trees has not been documented for most of the fungicides currently available. Rust-induced leaf spots develop when cedar apple rust and hawthorn rust infections are killed either by subsequent application of SI fungicides (Fig. 3) or by host incompatibility reactions (Fig. 4)
SI fungicides applied within 96 hr of the start of wetting periods will eliminate rust infections before they can cause visible damage to leaves. However, if SI fungicides are applied more than 4 days after infection, leaf cells invaded by the rust fungi will die even though the rust fungus is eradicated. These killed leaf cells result in small 1-2-mm diameter leaf spots that are tan or brown, sometimes with a tiny orange rust fleck in the center of the leaf spot. Similar lesions can appear on McIntosh, Empire, Liberty, and other rust-resistant cultivars if trees are subjected to high levels of rust inoculum in the absence of fungicide protection. On the rust-resistant cultivars, fungal development is arrested by the genetic resistance of the host rather than by fungicide activity, but the resulting leaf spots are similar. Leaf cells killed by the initial phases of rust infections provide an entry point for other less-pathogenic leaf spot pathogens such as Botryosphaeria, Alternaria, or Phomopsis species. These fungi invade cells killed or damaged by failed rust infections and then move into adjacent healthy tissue, thereby enlarging the leaf spots until the individual lesions look like frog-eye leaf spots. Rust-induced leaf spots can be distinguished from frog-eye leaf spots because the former are uniformly distributed throughout tree canopies, whereas the latter are clustered near inoculum sources. Sometimes the original orange-yellow rust lesion remains visible in the center of rust induced leaf spots, whereas frog-eye leaf spots never have such bright orange centers. Other leaf spots resulting from fungus-fungicide interactions can develop when SI fungicides, strobilurin fungicides (Sovran, Flint, Pristine), or Topsin M are applied to leaves that contain incubating apple scab or mildew lesions. Scab spots that are arrested during the early part of the incubation period (roughly 5 to 8 days after infection) can produce "ghost lesions." (Fig. 5)
Ghost lesions are indistinct pale spots 2-3 mm in diameter that develop where the scab fungus disrupted normal cell functions before the fungus was inactivated by the fungicide. The same fungicides applied just before scab lesions become visible can result in rusty, red-brown lesions that exhibit the usual size and shape of normal scab spots. (Fig. 6)
Post-infection application of the SIs and strobilurins can also cause "burned out" mildew lesions on leaves. Mildew lesions arrested by fungicides can appear on the upper leaf surface as large chlorotic lesions with indistinct margins, or on the lower leaf surface as more sharply-defined red blotches. (Fig. 7)
Portions of the leaf compromised by mildew may be more susceptible to subsequent invasion by secondary pathogens that may cause necrotic spots or larger irregular areas of leaf necrosis. Alternaria leaf spot appears as brown spots similar in size to frog-eye leaf spots. Alternaria species can be isolated from leaf spots in many orchards, especially in late summer, but Alternaria leaf spot does not cause economic damage in the northeast. In most cases, Alternaria is a secondary invader of damaged leaf tissue. In North Carolina and Virginia, however, a severe form of leaf spotting known as Alternaria blotch spreads rapidly during summer and causes premature defoliation of affected trees. Delicious is particularly susceptible. The strain of Alternaria mali that causes defoliation in the southeast may be different from the common Alternaria mali present in northeastern orchards. None of our fungicides are very effective for preventing Alternaria leaf spot or Alternaria blotch.
Upcoming Pest Events | Trap Catches | Pest Focus | Insects | Diseases | Erratum
Julie Carroll brought an error in the Tree Fruit Guidelines to my attention: The herbicides Roundup Original 2K and Roundup WeatherMax are listed in Table 51 (p. 233) under the active ingredient carfentrazone-ethyl. They are actually glyphosate materials and so should have appeared several lines up in the appropriate a.i. category. This material is based upon work supported by Smith Lever funds from the Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Scaffolds is published weekly from March to September by Cornell University -- NYS Agricultural Experiment Station (Geneva), and Ithaca -- with the assistance of Cornell Cooperative Extension. New York field reports welcomed. Send submissions by 3 p.m. Monday to: Scaffolds
Fruit Journal Online at <http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/ent/scaffolds/> Return to top
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||