|
Upcoming
Events | Trap
Catches | Pest Focus | Insects |
Diseases |
General Info | Erratum
| Current
DD accumulations |
43°F |
50°F |
(Geneva 1/1-6/11): |
936 |
571 |
(Geneva 1/1-6/11/2006): |
935 |
514 |
(Geneva "Normal" 1/1-6/11): |
910 |
530 |
(Geneva 1/1-6/18/2007, predicted): |
1107 |
700 |
(Highland 3/1-6/11/07): |
884 |
545 |
|
Coming Events: |
Ranges: |
|
American plum borer 1st flight peak |
360-1175 |
278-514 |
Black cherry fruit fly 1st catch |
686-985 |
380-576 |
Cherry fruit fly 1st catch |
650-1500 |
424-561 |
Codling moth 1st flight peak |
529-1326 |
325-581 |
Dogwood borer 1st catch |
733-1422 |
454-800 |
Lesser appleworm 1st flight peak |
372-1125 |
180-436 |
Oriental fruit moth 1st flight subsides |
781-1574 |
489-811 |
Peachtree borer 1st catch |
565-1557 |
443-837 |
Pear psylla 2nd brood hatch |
992-1200 |
584-750 |
Redbanded leafroller 1st flight subsides |
417-1104 |
325-561 |
1st Rose leafhopper adults on apple |
736-1104 |
440-622 |
San Jose scale 1st flight subsides |
768-1422 |
508-748 |
Spotted tentiform leafminer 2nd flight
begins |
795-1379 |
562-738 |
Return to top
Upcoming
Events | Trap Catches | Pest
Focus | Insects | Diseases | General
Info | Erratum
Geneva |
5/31 |
6/4 |
6/7 |
6/11 |
Redbanded Leafroller |
1.0 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
0.3 |
Spotted Tentiform Leafminer |
5.0 |
1.8 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
Oriental Fruit Moth |
0.5 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Codling Moth |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Lesser Appleworm |
0.8 |
3.9 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
San Jose scale |
57.5 |
3.8 |
0.8 |
0.0 |
American Plum Borer |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
Lesser Peachtree Borer |
2.5 |
1.5 |
0.2 |
0.9 |
Pandemis Leafroller |
- |
0.0 |
0.2* |
0.3 |
Obliquebanded Leafroller |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.4* |
Dogwood Borer |
- |
- |
0.0 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Highland (Peter Jentsch) |
5/21 |
5/29 |
6/4 |
6/11 |
Redbanded Leafroller |
0.0 |
0.0 |
- |
0.0 |
Spotted Tentiform Leafminer |
2.9 |
3.6 |
2.8 |
8.1 |
Oriental Fruit Moth |
1.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1* |
Codling Moth |
0.4 |
0.9 |
8.3 |
2.4 |
Lesser Appleworm |
0.6* |
4.6 |
10.4 |
4.5 |
Obliquebanded Leafroller |
- |
- |
0.5* |
2.4 |
Variegated Leafroller |
- |
- |
- |
0.9* |
| * = 1st catch |
|
|
|
|
Return to top
Upcoming
Events | Trap Catches | Pest
Focus | Insects | Diseases | General
Info | Erratum
Geneva: Pandemis
Leafroller 1st catch, 6/7.
Obliquebanded Leafroller
1st catch today, 6/11.
Highland: Oriental
Fruit Moth 2nd flight beginning.
Return to top
Upcoming
Events | Trap Catches | Pest
Focus | Insects | Diseases | General
Info | Erratum
Geneva Predictions:
Roundheaded Appletree Borer
Peak emergence: June 7.
Peak egglaying period roughly: June 20 to July 6.
Codling Moth
Codling moth development as of June 11: 1st generation adult
emergence at 77% and 1st generation egg hatch at 25%.
1st generation 20% CM egg hatch: June 10 (= target date where
one spray needed to control 1st generation codling moth).
Obliquebanded Leafroller
1st generation OBLR flight, first trap catch expected: June
8.
Where waiting to sample late instar OBLR larvae is not an option
(= where OBLR is known to be a problem, and will be managed
with insecticide against young larvae):
Early egg hatch and optimum date for initial application of
B.t., Intrepid, SpinTor or other insecticide with comparable
efficacy against OBLR (with follow-up applications as needed):
June 22.
Oriental Fruit Moth
2nd generation flight begins around: June 27.
San Jose Scale
1st generation crawlers appear: June 16.
Spotted Tentiform Leafminer
2nd flight begins around: June 14.
Return
to top
THOSE
WERE THE (DEGREE) DAYS |
|
MODEL BUILDING
|
Insect model degree day accumulations:
Codling Moth (targeted spray application
at newly hatching larvae, predicted at 250-360 DD base 50°F
after biofix):
| Location |
Biofix |
DD (as of 6/11) |
Clintondale |
May 14 |
433 |
Geneva |
May 17 |
328 (Farmington data) |
Sodus |
May 17 |
281 |
Guilderland |
May 23 |
405 |
Ithaca |
May 24 |
288 |
Lansing |
May 24 |
313 |
Albion |
May 25 |
301 |
Williamson |
May 25 |
276 |
Appleton (South) |
May 25 |
290 |
Appleton (North) |
May 25 |
253 |
Waterport |
May 28 |
253 |
Plum Curculio (spray coverage required
until 308 DD base 50°F after biofix; i.e., McIntosh petal
fall):
| Location |
Biofix |
DD (as of 6/11) |
Clintondale |
5/14 |
433 |
Guilderland |
5/15 |
479 |
Geneva |
5/21 |
317 (Farmington data) |
Albion |
5/21 (50% PF) |
379 |
Williamson |
5/21 (50% PF) |
327 |
Lansing |
5/22 |
339 |
Appleton |
5/22 (50% PF) |
288 |
Sodus |
5/24 (est'd.) |
246 |
Ithaca |
5/24 |
288 |
[NOTE: Consult our mini expert system for arthropod pest
management, the
Apple Pest Degree Day Calculator:
http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/ipm/specware/newa/appledd.php
Find accumulated degree days between dates with the
Degree Day Calculator:
http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/ipm/specware/newa/
Powered by the NYS IPM Program’s NEWA weather data
and the Baskerville-Emin formula]
Return to top
Upcoming
Events | Trap Catches | Pest
Focus | Insects | Diseases | General
Info | Erratum
It may be a good year for stone fruit in NY,
considering that we appear to have escaped the spring freezes
that wiped out the stone fruit crops in the surrounding states
and in the south. Unfortunately, the threat of Sterol
Inhibitor (SI) resistance is still with us in 2007. Unless
we are careful, SI resistance could reduce or eliminate the
usefulness of our best brown rot fungicides: Indar, Orbit,
and Elite.
In 2005, the first reports of suspected brown rot resistance to
SI fungicides in NY were confirmed. Control failures using Indar on the
fruit rot phase of the disease were being reported on peaches at several orchards
in the lower Hudson Valley and in an orchard in Niagara County. The Lab
of Dr. Wolfram Köller found that one-fifth of the brown rot isolates from
the reported sites showed decreased sensitivity to Indar. In the fall of
2006, I found that 14 out of 30 isolates collected from orchards in the Finger
Lakes region were above the baseline sensitivity reported in 1993.
At this point, we still don't know how prevalent
SI resistance to brown rot is in NY. SI resistance
in brown rot is also occurring in other states. One
of the first instances of SI resistance in brown rot occurred
in the peach-growing region of middle Georgia, and in the
fall of 2006, we found that 10 brown rot isolates from two
orchards in Ohio were also above Indar baseline sensitivity.
How did this resistance develop? Resistant
brown rot populations usually develop due to an over-reliance
on one particular fungicide chemistry, which in our case
is the SIs (Indar, Orbit, and Elite). As Wolfram Köller
mentioned in last year's article on brown rot, resistance
is unlikely to have developed from consecutive applications
to manage fruit rot, but probably arose from consecutive
use patterns beginning much earlier around white bud for
blossom blight. In addition, overuse of fungicides
doesn't necessarily have to be on-site for resistance to
develop; it's entirely possible that resistant populations
could come in from nearby sources.
What can we do to reduce buildup of
resistance? Unfortunately, switching to one of
the other SIs labeled on stone fruit — e.g., Orbit,
Elite, Rubigan, and Nova — is of no use, as the resistance
seems to hold for all compounds in the SI chemistry. At
this stage of the game, if we want to keep the SIs for
brown rot, we must continue to curb our SI usage and rotate
in fungicides from other chemistries.
The first step is to avoid using SIs for early
season control during bloom and petal fall. If
you can't beat the rains for blossom blight and need that
'kick-back' activity, use one of the two Rovral (Iprodione)
applications allowed for the season. Rovral is known
to have up to 48 hr post-infection activity against blossom
blight, and to date there have been no reports of Rovral
resistance. Several of the strobilurin (stroby) fungicides
are labeled for use on blossom blight at the petal fall spray
in stone fruit, but may not be the best option, as it would
use up one of the total allowed stroby uses for the season. Another
possibility for blossom blight is the Anilinopyrimidine (AP)
fungicides Scala and Vangard. These two have post-infection
activity, but have label use restrictions for cherries. Topsin
M generally is not recommended for brown rot control because
benzimidazole resistance is present in orchards where Benlate
and Topsin M were used to control brown rot in the 1970s
and 1980s. However, Topsin M might still be effective
in young orchards that are isolated from the older orchards
that harbor benzimidazole-resistant brown rot. Using
Topsin M plus captan for blossom blight control would pose
relatively little risk (since the captan will work even if
Topsin M does not).
Prior to and at shuck split,
Captan or a Captan+sulfur combination is an option if disease
pressure is low (i.e., relatively dry weather) and if the
cherry and plum cultivars being sprayed will tolerate Captan. For
controlling cherry leaf spot and/or black knot in addition
to brown rot, consider chlorothalonil (Bravo), as it should
have good activity against all three.
One to three weeks after shuck split,
fruit will be fairly susceptible, but try to avoid the SIs
and continue with Captan and sulfur, especially in bouts
of dry weather or if disease pressure has been low. In
cases where 'kick-back' is needed due to a pop-up rain event,
an SI can be used if they are still working for you. Where
SIs failed to provide good brown rot control last year, the
only other option for post-infection activity is one of the
stroby fungicides. The strobies don't have the same
level of post-infection activity as the SIs, but they have
good activity against fruit rot. Of the strobies, only
Abound and Pristine (mixture of the stroby Cabrio with another
unrelated respiration inhibitor) are labeled for the brown
fruit rot phase. Between the two fungicides, Pristine
is the clear favorite because it consists of two distinct
chemistries, doesn't defoliate 'McIntosh' and 'Gala' apples,
and allows for up to five applications per season. Regardless
of your choice, no more than two consecutive stroby applications
can be made.
As fruit begin to ripen and
temperatures become warmer, brown rot pressure will be considerable. At
this point the only viable options will be the SIs and strobies,
particularly on the sweet cherries, which are the most susceptible
due to higher sugar content compared with tart cherries. Since
SI resistance is becoming a concern in NY, it will be more
important to start substituting in Pristine applications
in your fruit rot program. Even if you don't have SI
resistance, make an effort to alternate between Pristine
and SI fungicides to help ensure that resistance doesn't
develop in years to come. If you have SI resistance
in brown rot populations, Pristine is one of the few options
left to manage fruit rot. Although Pristine has two
different fungicide chemistries, it is in no way exempt from
fungicide resistance concerns, which is why there are only
two consecutive and five total applications allowed per season. Should
you have to fall back on a protectant such as Captan and
sulfur between Pristine applications, try to plan the protectant
application for the potentially lightest wetting period. If
you don't have cherries, Scala (AP) can be included in a
tank mix for fruit rot control according to the label. This
may provide some 'kick-back' in situations where SI resistance
has limited other options.
What else can we do minimize brown
rot? With peaches, apricots, and plums,
hand-thinning can significantly reduce brown rot pressure. Fruit
that are in contact with one another are generally more
susceptible to brown rot either due to lack of fungicide
coverage at the contact point and/or because the fruit
cuticle is thinner where fruit contact one another. Thus,
careful hand-thinning of fruit can reduce brown rot pressure
while also contributing to improved fruit size.
What else should we watch for? Orchards
that contain peach cultivars selected to mature at various
time through summer pose a special dilemma for managing fungicide
resistance to brown rot. Even though any given cultivar
may receive only two or three preharvest fungicide sprays,
brown rot inoculum can move from one cultivar to the next
as fruit mature, which means that the brown rot population
may be exposed to six, eight, or 10 preharvest fungicide
applications as fungicides are applied to sequentially ripening
cultivars within the same or adjoining orchards. Where
sequentially ripening cultivars occur in the same block,
it is especially important to alternate fungicide chemistries
during the preharvest sprays. All cultivars sprayed
on any given date should be sprayed with the same fungicide
so that spores blowing back and for the between cultivars
cannot "escape" exposure to the alternate fungicide
chemistry.
When planning new peach orchards, consider
segregating early varieties and later varieties into different
blocks that are physically separated by intervening apple
orchards, woodlots, or other cropland. Such a design
would shorten the annual period of peak selection pressure
from brown rot resistance, since spores from early-maturing
cultivars would be less likely to get blown to trees of later
maturing varieties.
If you suspect or fear fungicide resistance
at your site, or have some brown rot on a few fruit, head
over to the tree fruit and berry pathology website: http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/pp/extension/tfabp/index.html to
contact us about collecting some samples. Also included
at the site is an updated version of Wolfram Köller's
2006 overview of fungicides labeled for brown rot in New
York. The list may be directly accessed here: http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/pp/extension/tfabp/brownrot.htm
Return to top
Upcoming
Events | Trap Catches | Pest
Focus | Insects | Diseases | General
Info | Erratum
The next in the series of
extension demonstrations that have been organized about using
sensor-controlled precision spray systems with tower orchard
sprayers will take place at Kast Farms, on Zig-Zag Road (Between
Densmore and Latin Rd., see map) on June 20 at 10:00 am. Growers
are encouraged to attend, to view the latest technology at
work and to hear about the potential savings in pesticide
used.

|
CAN YOU SAY QUASQUICENTENNIAL?
|
Cornell University will host a Fruit
Field Day and Equipment Show at the New York State
Agricultural Experiment Station in Geneva, NY on Wednesday
July 25. This event will commemorate the 125th anniversary
of the Experiment Station, which opened its doors on March
1, 1882. Fruit growers, consultants, and industry personnel
are invited to tour field plots and learn about the latest
research and extension efforts being carried out by researchers
on the Geneva and Ithaca campuses. The focus will be on
all commodities key to New York's $300 million fruit industry:
apples, grapes, raspberries, strawberries, peaches, pears,
cherries, and nectarines.
Equipment demonstrations will provide the latest techniques
in improving sprayer deposition plus orchard and vineyard
maintenance.
Representatives from various companies will advise growers
on the latest technologies. The Cornell pesticide application
technology team will demonstrate different methods of improving
deposition and testing sprayers, including tips about nozzle
orientation.
The event will be held on the Station's Fruit
and Vegetable Research Farm South, 1097 County Road No. 4,
1 mile west of Pre-emption Rd. in Geneva, NY. Signs will
be posted. Attendees will be able to select from tours of
apples, stone fruits, small fruits, and grapes, as well as
a tour of the Station’s labs and greenhouses. Admission
is free and lunch is provided, courtesy of industry sponsors.
Pre-registration is encouraged.
For sponsorship and exhibitor information,
contact Debbie Breth at 585-798-4265 or dib1@cornell.edu.
More information will be posted on a website in the very
near future.
Return to top
Upcoming
Events | Trap Catches | Pest
Focus | Insects | Diseases | General
Info | Erratum
An error was brought to our
attention in the recommendations for borer sprays in cherries
at petal fall, on pp. 163 and 209 in the Pest Management
Guidelines. The current PHI is now 21 days. (A
previous label had it at 6 days.)
Return to top
This
material is based upon work supported by Smith Lever
funds from the Cooperative State Research, Education,
and Extension Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations
expressed in this publication are those of the author(s)
and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department
of Agriculture.
Scaffolds
is published weekly from March to September by Cornell University
-- NYS Agricultural Experiment Station (Geneva), and Ithaca
-- with the assistance of Cornell Cooperative Extension.
New York field reports welcomed. Send submissions by 3 p.m.
Monday to:
Scaffolds
Fruit Journal
Editors: A. Agnello, D. Kain
Dept. of Entomology, NYSAES
P.O. Box 462
Geneva, NY 14456-0462
Phone: 315-787-2341 FAX: 315-787-2326
E-mail: ama4@cornell.edu
Online
at <http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/ent/scaffolds/>
Return to top

|