March 22, 1999 Volume 8 No. 1

Coming Events & Current Situation
General Information
Insects

Scaffolds is published weekly from March to September by Cornell University -- NYS Agricultural Experiment Station (Geneva), and Ithaca -- with the assistance of Cornell Cooperative Extension.

New York field reports welcomed. Send submissions by 3 p.m. Monday to:

Scaffolds Fruit Journal

Editors: A. Agnello, D. Kain

Dept. of Entomology, NYSAES

Geneva, NY 14456-0462

Phone: 315-787-2341 FAX: 315-787-2326

Scaffolds 99 index

EGG HUNT

(Art Agnello, Entomology)

The European red mite (ERM), Panonychus ulmi (Koch), is the most important mite species attacking deciduous fruit orchards of North America, being the only species in NY that can maintain itself at high populations in commercial orchards, and is one of the few mites in the state that overwinters as a fertilized egg. The egg is dark red, has a ridged surface, and is a slightly flattened or onion shape in form including a short "stalk" arising from the egg's center. The winter eggs are frequently deposited in groups on roughened areas of the bark --especially around the bases of buds and fruit spurs -- and may be so numerous as to give, to the unaided eye, a reddish cast to infested areas.


European red mite overwintered eggs on bark

Winter egg deposition occurs over a relatively long period during the summer. This form passes the winter in a state of diapause, or arrested development, which carries the population through the cold winter period that is unfavorable for growth. When the weather returns to conditions in which the mite can resume active life, diapausing eggs are stimulated to hatch. Some winter eggs may be laid in July, but most are deposited from mid- to late August. Environmental factors inducing winter egg production include: diminishing food supply (or food quality), lowered temperature, and decreasing photoperiod (daylength). Of these, photoperiod and temperature are the most important factors. Food availability becomes a factor if it is depleted or restricted, as can happen when populations reach high levels early in the season, and the quality of the foliage on which they occur suffers because of excessive feeding. This drop in food quality can condition the females to produce winter eggs somewhat before the temperature and daylength alone would cause the mites to enter diapause. Such situations have been observed to take place as early as mid-July. If injury to foliage is not severe early in the season, populations often build up significantly in late August and early September. Many of these late-appearing females deposit their eggs in the calyx and stem ends of apple fruits, in addition to the wood surface.

The survival of the winter ERM egg has been addressed by a few researchers in the past, and some facts are known fairly well, but others have yet to be formally documented. First of all, the outer shell of winter egg is structurally similar to that of ERM eggs laid in the summer, except that the summer egg is vulnerable to desiccation up to six hours after deposition, but the winter egg is able to survive desiccating conditions as soon as it is deposited. Both types of egg are laid on the substrate, and then a layer of cement (for attachment) and a layer of wax (for waterproofing) is secreted over it; however, the winter egg is held in the mite until a developmental stage at which it is already waterproofed, before being laid and receiving these additional coverings.

The eggs must go through a period of chilling in order to resume their development and proceed to hatch; it is estimated that hatching occurs 3-4 weeks after the breaking of diapause. Studies have found that the fully developed mite embryo (= larval stage) is stimulated to break the eggshell by light; in one trial, 86% of the eggs being studied hatched during daylight. Researchers have found that winter eggs in diapause never hatch if temperatures remain between 64-77 F, but diapause can be broken by chilling the eggs (at 34-48 F) for 100 to 200 days. Less time is required at lower chilling temperatures.

Every year, the winter weather pattern in NY produces questions about the effect on ERM eggs, in terms of their ability to either tolerate exceptionally cold temperatures, or to take advantage of unusually mild weather. The fact is that there is always some winter mortality of ERM eggs, that it can be quite variable (ranging from perhaps 15% to nearly 60% in severe cases), and that it is dependent on many different factors, such as orchard micro-habitat and air drainage, amount of snow cover, and genetic characteristics of local populations, in addition to simple raw temperature readings. One study conducted in NY after the extremely cold winter of 1956-57 showed that ERM hatch was cut drastically (to 1-20% of normal) in western NY after a 3-5-day period in the -23 to -28 F range, but that hatch reduction was not uniformly this severe in the Lake Champlain growing region following the same temperature pattern. These results suggest that the eggs in that district may have been conditioned to withstand lower winter temperatures than in warmer parts of the state. The long-term average winter minimum in Peru is approximately -22 F, whereas in the Geneva area it ranges from -10 to -15 F.

Bearing this in mind, it still should be noted that an evaluation of winter ERM egg numbers is used for management purposes in some apple growing regions. One representative procedure was developed by Dick Rogers in Nova Scotia during the early 1990's, and is still used routinely with success by growers in that area. The technique involves examining 10 spurs from each of 3-10 trees per block to determine egg abundance. The "spur" sample unit is defined to be the equivalent of about 3 cm (slightly >1 inch) of wood around a spur or bud from at least 2-yr old wood that is <2 cm (0.8 inch) in diameter. Spurs are examined on the trees to avoid time-consuming collection and laboratory analysis. A scoring of the abundance of eggs on this unit of spur wood is based on a scale from 0-4, as follows:

SCORE

NUMBER OF EGGS

0

0

1

1-10

2

11-50

3

51-100

4

>100

The scores for all the spurs in a sample are tallied, and an average score is calculated by dividing the total tally by the number of spurs examined. Three levels of intervention are envisioned as being possible outcomes of the sampling process. Therefore, three arbitrary thresholds were established that could be related to the scoring system used. These are shown below:

THRESHOLD

RECOMMENDATION

EXAMPLE ERM EGG POPULATION

0

No treatment

0% of spurs w/ eggs

0.1

Superior oil "concentrate" (a product not available in the US) at 0.5% at tight cluster

10% of spurs w/ 1-10 eggs

1.0

Superior oil (i.e., 6E) at 1-2% at tight cluster

100% of spurs w/ 1-10 eggs

2.0

Early season ovicide (e.g. Apollo)

100% of spurs w/ 11-50 eggs

This method appears to be reliable in Nova Scotia, provided the persons sampling have some training and experience, and mite counts in June suggest that egg scores may even be a fairly good predictor of post-bloom mite numbers. However, it should be mentioned that this type of sampling method has not been verified under NY conditions, and that differences in mite populations, weather patterns, and mite control products (history and labelling restrictions) could very well necessitate considerable modifications of the above guidelines. Nevertheless, egg scores might be useful as a relative index of potential mite numbers in any block, although the overriding influence of spring weather conditions should never be dismissed as an ultimate factor in the development of early summer ERM populations.

In general, it can be an advisable practice to survey the spur wood in blocks with a history of moderate to severe mite problems, particularly after seasons when mites were not so abundant, because under such conditions high populations can build up and lay high numbers of eggs in September (after the grower has stopped thinking about them). A severely cold winter can reduce the viability of the eggs that are present in the spring, but favorable developmental weather early in the season can easily compensate for a small founding egg population, whereas a cold, wet and extended April and May can serve as effectively to retard mite development as would a good early season spray program.

Scaffolds 99 index