Scaffolds 99 index
|
APPLE SCAB UPDATE
(Dave Rosenberger dar22@cornell.edu
& Fritz Meyer fwm4@cornell.edu,
Plant Pathology, Highland)
An
apple scab squash mount assessment done on April 7 showed 13% mature spores,
0 % empty asci, and 2 spores per scan in the shooting-tower discharge
test. Economically significant ascospore release usually begins when our
squash mount counts show 15% mature spores. We had several warm days toward
the end of last week, so spore maturity in the Hudson Valley is now sufficiently
advanced to ensure that significant ascospore discharges will occur with
the next rains.
Wetting periods occurred April 9 (9.6 hrs, 43°F.)
and April 11-12 (16 hrs, 38°F.) Neither of these provided adequate
temperature/wetness duration for scab infection to occur.
MORE ON CONTROLLING APPLE SCAB
(Dave Rosenberger, dar22@cornell.edu,
Plant Pathology, Highland)
Weather
conditions during the early scab season have created the usual "unique"
dilemmas concerning when and what to spray for apple scab. In the Hudson
Valley, weather forecasters have predicted "scattered showers" on three
different occasions since Green Tip. Any one of these events could have
turned into a scab infection period. As it turned out, none of them did.
With conditions like these, Hudson Valley growers
who took the cautious approach and applied protectant fungicides ahead
of the infection periods probably "wasted" their money. Those who opted
to wait until after the first infection period and then spray with an
eradicant fungicide may have shaved one or two fungicide applications
from their spray bill. On paper, it appears that delaying the first scab
spray until after the first infection period makes good sense. Those opting
for eradicant fungicides have the option of using either Vangard (with
48-hour kickback activity) or one of the SI-protectant combinations (96-hr
kickback).
However, there are some hidden risks in depending
on eradicants for the first spray. First, weather conditions after the
infection period are often less-than-ideal for getting good coverage.
Figure that the infection period itself lasts one day, so that leaves
only one more day of spray time to take advantage of the eradicant activity
of Vangard or three days of eradicant activity for SI fungicides. Then,
remember that the frontal systems that bring clear weather also bring
wind, so there's a good chance that day 2 (and perhaps day 3) after the
infection period will be windy. Maybe you're willing to gamble that day
3 or day 4 will provide ideal spraying conditions, but then there's always
the risk that the sprayer will break down, especially if this is the first
spray of the season.
If sprays are applied in the wind, one must assume
that coverage will be less-than-perfect. When a protectant fungicide (mancozeb,
metiram, or captan) is applied under windy conditions ahead of a rain,
one can take comfort in knowing that the same rains that discharge scab
spores will also redistribute fungicide residues. Thus, protectant fungicides
are a bit "forgiving" when it comes to coverage, and imperfect coverage
does not necessarily result in poor scab control. When fungicides are
applied as eradicants, however, the scab spores are already in place when
the fungicide is applied and complete coverage is essential for good control.
In my opinion, waiting to apply the first spray until
after the first infection period is a high-risk strategy for orchards
where inoculum levels are high. There are just too many uncontrolled variables
and too many things that can go wrong. Using an eradicant as the first
scab spray can save money in dry years and is a sensible approach for
low-inoculum orchards. In high-inoculum orchards, it will be safer to
get a protectant fungicide applied ahead of the first scab infection period.
It will allow you to sleep better and appreciate the rain!
4.12 Insects
|