|
|
Pictures are linked
to hi-res scans
|
|

Suggested caption: The principle
scientists involved with the Bt pyramid gene project are
(inset photo - left to right) Jun Cao and Lisa Earle (Plant
Breeding, Ithaca), Tony Shelton and Jian-Zhou Zhao (Entomology,
Geneva). The background photo, taken in the greenhouse
in Geneva, NY, shows some of the large cages used in the
tests with Bt broccoli.
Credit: J. Ogrodnick/NYSAES/Cornell
|
FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE
November 26,
2003
Contact:
Linda McCandless, 315-787-2417
Cornell Entomologists Demonstrate Better Insect Control with Novel Technique of "Gene Pyramiding"
by Peter Seem
GENEVA, NY: Entomologists at Cornell University
have provided the first experimental evidence that breeding plants
to produce two different proteins by a process called "gene
pyramiding" delays the development of resistance in targeted
insect pests. The research has important implications for the long-term
protection of agricultural crops produced through biotechnology,
particularly Bt corn and Bt cotton. The team performed the research
using diamondback moths, one of the world's major insect pests,
and Bt broccoli.
The paper, "Transgenic plants expressing
two Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt)
toxins delay insect resistance evolution," will
be published in the journal Nature Biotechnology on
December 1.
Bt, or Bacillus thuringiensis, is a type of bacterium that produces proteins toxic
to many major agricultural insect pests. Bt was promoted as an
environmentally benign insecticide by Rachel Carson in her 1962
book, Silent Spring. Even though it is benign, Bt accounts for less than
two percent of the world's insecticides because of its cost and
relatively low effectiveness. When plant breeders developed the
technology to genetically engineer the gene for Bt into a specific
crop, the crop itself became a very effective method of control.
Bt plants were first commercialized in 1996, and Bt corn and
Bt cotton became widely used alternatives to conventionally bred
corn and cotton. In 2002, Bt crops were grown on 36 million acres
worldwide.
"Breeding plants to express Bt proteins provides
positive economic benefits to growers, and health benefits for
the environment and farm workers," said Tony Shelton, Cornell
University professor of entomology at the New York State Agricultural
Experiment Station, in Geneva, NY, and one of the paper's authors. "We're
moving into the second generation of the technology now. As techniques
have become more sophisticated, technology allows us to pyramid
two Bt genes in a plant."
The paper is the result of 10 years of research
by Shelton and his collaborators to develop transgenic plants as
an alternative to conventional insecticide sprays. Using dual-toxin
broccoli plants developed by Elizabeth Earle and Jun Cao, in the
plant breeding department at Cornell, Shelton's lab examined how
resistance to the two toxins developed in a population of diamondback
moth after 24 generations. Resistance was compared under several
different management strategies.
"Plants containing two Bt toxin genes substantially
delayed the development of resistance compared to two single-toxin
plants used sequentially or in a mosaic," said Shelton. "Regulatory
agencies and companies now should work together to promote the
development of these pyramid plants and, in the long term, phase
out single gene plants."
Mathematical models of insect resistance suggest
that plants with genes for two different Bt toxins would delay
resistance longer than planting a mixture of two single-toxin plants
in the field (called a mosaic), or using two single-toxin plants
sequentially in crop rotation. Such models have already prompted
one company to develop a variety of cotton that expresses two Bt
proteins. Shelton's lab provides the first experimental confirmation
of the value of dual-toxin plants.
Since the commercialization of Bt plants for insect
control, there have been no instances of insect populations developing
resistance in the field, but there is a constant danger that the
pest species will develop resistance to the toxin, as has happened
with many conventional insecticides. To help prevent insects from
developing resistance to transgenic Bt crops, the EPA has mandated
that a portion of acreage next to a Bt crop be devoted to what
is called a "refuge." A refuge is an area in which the
non-transgenic version of the crop is grown. This area allows some
susceptible insects to survive so that the gene that encodes for
resistance does not become abundant in the insect population.
In addition to providing better resistance management,
plants with pyramided genes for Bt proteins require less space
set aside as refuge, which helps growers (for whom a refuge can
represent a significant portion of the crop damaged) get a greater
return for their acreage. Preventing insect resistance also extends
the useful life of Bt crops, which helps manufacturers and growers.
"We have based resistance management programs
in the United States on some pretty solid theory, but Shelton and
his team have given us very useful data," said Fred Gould,
professor of entomology at North Carolina State University, and
a leading expert on Bt crops. "This research should make the
EPA and companies more open to developing pyramided or dual-toxin
plants."
"This work has important implications in
the U.S., but also in Australia, India and China, where millions
of acres of the cotton crop contains Bt," adds Jian-Zhou Zhao,
the paper's first author.
"Using more Bt crops and less insecticide
are environmentally and people friendly strategies in pest control," said
Shelton. "The next step in our research program is to extend
the crop's useful life by having plants express the Bt proteins
only when the crop is most susceptible to insect damage."
This research was funded by the USDA's National
Research Initiative Competitive Grants Program.
#
# # #
|