OVERVIEW
OF VITICULTURE CONSORTIUM-EAST
CORNELL UNIVERSITY GENEVA, NY
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this
program is to maintain an Eastern component of the National Viticulture
Consortium through which research in support of Eastern viticulture
and the grape industry will be coordinated and, through a grant
program, universities can be assisted in their funding of important
research projects. The objective of these projects is to improve
the competitiveness of the grape industry and result in higher
quality grape products for consumers.
PROCEDURES: Cornell
University will continue operation of the Viticulture Consortium-East
that was begun in 1995 under the direction of a Project Manager
and Regional Guidance Committee.
This committee consists of industry, research and extension personnel,
and determines research needs of both growers and processors, the
current status of research in support of viticulture, and identifies
areas of specific concern not currently being adequately addressed
to meet the needs of the grape industry. A request for research
proposals designed to address these needs was sent to experiment
stations and universities in the Eastern states with evidence of
viticulturerelated research. A scientist review panel was formed
to evaluate and rate the proposals. The criteria for this evaluation
was based on the Regional Guidance Committee’s recommendations
and priorities as to critical needs, the appropriateness of the
proposal to meet those needs, the appropriateness of the experimental
design, and the adequacy of the personnel and facilities to ensure
the fulfillment of the objectives of the proposal. Funding decisions
were made by the Project Manager in consultation with the Regional
Guidance Committee in consideration of the impact the research
will have on the industry, the results of the scientific review
committee, and the availability of funds. The awards history for
the first eleven years of operation may be found in Table
1.
CURRENT RESEARCH: As
a result of the 2008 RFP, the Scientific
Review Panel and the Guidance Committee evaluated 74 grant proposals
received from 16 States. Fifty-five proposals from 14 states were
selected for funding. The number of funded proposals and funding
levels were similar to the previous year. Table
2 lists the 2008 awards with titles,
sponsoring states, level of Consortium funding, and where known,
matching funds contributed by foundations, companies or other
non-experiment station sources.
REPORTS FOR 2006 GRANTS: The
proposals funded as a result of the 2007 RFP are listed in Table
3. Reports describing progress made during the
2007 contract year are found below.